Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure

The lawsuit says Thinx underwear, long marketed as safe and sustainable, contains harmful chemical substances known as PFAS. The company denies those allegations but will pay up to $5 million.

Thinx period pants lawsuit: do they contain toxic chemicals?

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

PFAS Class-Action Thinx Period Underwear Lawsuit Settled for $5 Million

Thinx class-action lawsuit settlement for harmful chemicals

Toxic chemicals in period underwear? What to know as U.S.-based Thinx settles lawsuit - National

Period Underwear Maker Thinx Settles Lawsuit for $5 Million - LA Weekly

Toxic chemicals in period underwear? What to know as U.S.-based Thinx settles lawsuit - National

The Thinx Lawsuit Has Us Asking: Is Period Underwear Safe?

Thinx period underwear lawsuit over PFAS settles for $4 million

Thinx underwear chemicals $4M class action lawsuit settlement - Top Class Actions

Up to 65% of period underwear contains toxic forever chemicals linked to infertility

Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post

Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR

$1.4M Knix Period Underwear Class Action Settlement

Thinx Settles Class-Action Lawsuit: Here's What You Need To Know About PFAS, Nation