Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size

Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89.  from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

13 60 mm hi-res stock photography and images - Page 4 - Alamy

Otolith morphometry and Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR

Relationships between (a) fork length and otolith radius and (b

Larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt diets as a function of fish size

PDF) A novel length back-calculation approach accounting for ontogenetic changes in the fish length – otolith size relationship during the early life of sprat (Sprattus sprattus)

PDF) A novel length back-calculation approach accounting for ontogenetic changes in the fish length – otolith size relationship during the early life of sprat (Sprattus sprattus)

Relationship Between Otolith Measurements with the Size of

Oceans, Free Full-Text

Frontiers Bomb Radiocarbon, Otolith Daily Increments and Length