Generalized Systematic Review Template Joins OSF Registries

Researchers, no matter their discipline or study design, can use OSF to (pre)register their research. Registration refers to archiving one’s study design and outputs (e.g., data or analysis code) so that this information is immutable and persistently available in a public repository. Currently, over 126,000 registrations are archived and publicly available on OSF Registries with more than 453,000 indexed from other community registries. To help researchers register rigorous, reproducible study designs, several registration templates have been implemented on OSF. But as OSF’s user base has continued to grow, the community’s need to archive systematic reviews has become apparent.

Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews, BMC Infectious Diseases

Religions, Free Full-Text

Effectiveness of combined interventions to empower girls and address social norms in reducing child marriage in a rural sub-district of Bangladesh: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of the Tipping Point Initiative —

Family Forms Survey: Identifying Donor-Conceived Offspring, Donors, and Recipients in a National Panel

A scoping review investigating the use of exposure for the treatment and targeted prevention of anxiety and related disorders in young people - Teunisse - 2022 - JCPP Advances - Wiley Online Library

Finding existing systematic reviews and registration sites - Systematic reviews - How do I guides at The University of Adelaide

KOMB: K-core based de novo characterization of copy number variation in microbiomes - Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Volume 22 Issue 4 by Western Journal of Emergency Medicine - Issuu

December 7th Community Call: Introducing a New Systematic Review Preregistration Template