Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

$ 18.00 · 4.5 (479) · In stock

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

A Randomized Trial Comparing Polymer Versus Suture-Based Vascular Closure Devices for Arterial Closure Following Lower-Limb Arterial Endovascular Revascularization

Computed Tomography Imaging in the Context of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)/Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

SOLACI Latin American Society of Interventional Cardiology

Vascular Closure Devices For Axillary Artery Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - Alex Koziarz, Sean A. Kennedy, Ghassan Awad El-Karim, Kong T. Tan, George D. Oreopoulos, Sanjog Kalra, Christian D. Etz

Alberto P. on LinkedIn: Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis…

Vascular Closure Device Update - Endovascular Today

One-year outcomes with two suture-mediated closure devices to achieve access-site haemostasis following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Frontiers A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Terumo Femoseal

MANTA® Vascular Closure Device Deployment

Large-Bore Access Site Management - Cardiac Interventions Today

Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention

Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation: New Criteria to Predict Vascular Complications